It wasn't all smooth sailing. Critics pointed to three major flaws:
By the end of 2016, Western Union had processed over $80 billion in principal, moved money across 130 currencies, and crucially, grown its digital revenue by 17% to nearly $800 million. They had proven that a brick-and-mortar giant could survive the app revolution by becoming the infrastructure behind the apps.
In a surprising twist, Western Union realized that "unbanked" recipients still had banked senders. In 2016, they slashed fees for transfers going directly to bank accounts in key corridors (Mexico, Philippines, China). They undercut TransferWise on speed in specific lanes, noting that while TransferWise took 2-3 days for a bank transfer, Western Union could do it in minutes via their stored balance network.
It wasn't all smooth sailing. Critics pointed to three major flaws:
By the end of 2016, Western Union had processed over $80 billion in principal, moved money across 130 currencies, and crucially, grown its digital revenue by 17% to nearly $800 million. They had proven that a brick-and-mortar giant could survive the app revolution by becoming the infrastructure behind the apps. c2016 western union
In a surprising twist, Western Union realized that "unbanked" recipients still had banked senders. In 2016, they slashed fees for transfers going directly to bank accounts in key corridors (Mexico, Philippines, China). They undercut TransferWise on speed in specific lanes, noting that while TransferWise took 2-3 days for a bank transfer, Western Union could do it in minutes via their stored balance network. It wasn't all smooth sailing